About My Brilliant Mistakes
This is the blog of Cynthia Closkey — web designer, writer, and all-around swell gal.
Recently
Holiday Music Countdown: Numbers 25 to 23, with mambo, sleigh rides, and sanity restoration ( 4 December 2007)
Yo ( 3 December 2007)
All the fun that's fit to print ( 2 December 2007)
The day after: thoughts on my Month Impossible ( 1 December 2007)
Month Impossible: Day Thirty, This is the end (30 November 2007)
Subscribe!
This site is powered by an incredibly old version of
Movable Type (2.661)
Advertisements
Archives
« Previous | Most recent | Next »
"It's not going to work"
Tuesday, 13 April 2004 11:08 AM
Ad Age reports that "a growing number of marketers want to persuade the nation's print magazines to open the text of their editorial pages to product placements." I'm not particularly swayed by the moral arguemnts on either side of the issue, but I agree with the editor quoted in the article who feels that blurring the lines between journalistic and marketing content will dilute the power of each:
An editor in chief elsewhere put the commercial argument of church and state in more blunt terms. "Without a visceral relationship with the reader, it's not going to work," this editor said. "Don't be getting in the middle of that" with product placement. "My reader's gonna say, 'What's this [expletive] for?'"
We're seeing more instances of companies buying their way into storylines -- the Bulgari novel, product placements in movies, television, and video games, etc. -- but the fact that they may work now doesn't guarantee that they'll continue to do so. Over time, the power of such placement dilutes as more companies try the same tactics and viewers/consumers become aware of the process and are jaded. Why rush things along by forcing marketing messages into editorial content?
Permanent link | Categories: Business/marketing , Writing/publishing
Copyright © 2004 – 2007 Cynthia Closkey




